![]() The Radeon R9 295X2 posts a great benchmark run, beating GeForce GTX Titan X by 29%. Perhaps this is related to the fact that AMD still hasn’t officially released a CrossFire profile for Far Cry 4 it’ll make its debut in the driver we’re testing in a couple of days. ![]() The Radeon R9 295X2 does enjoy another technical win, but again starts the benchmark with frame rates under the Titan X, touching Radeon R9 290X territory. The stereotypical reaction to this sort of control interface and jerky performance is, “ugh, console port.” And despite similar average frame rates as Battlefield 4, the Far Cry 4 experience doesn’t feel as smooth. Meanwhile, the Titan X leads Nvidia’s own GeForce GTX 980 by 30%, surpassing the original Titan by an even more astounding 74%.Įven on high-end hardware at relatively modest settings, Far Cry 4 just doesn’t run like a mature first-person shooter. ![]() At times, it’s actually slower than the more consistent GeForce GTX Titan X. But a look at frame rate over time shows that card’s lead to be sporadic. On paper, the Radeon R9 295X2 enjoys a commanding 32% advantage over Nvidia’s GeForce GTX Titan X in Far Cry 4 at 2560x1440 using the Ultra quality preset. You’d simply have to be alright with its higher power requirement, bulky closed-loop water cooling solution and dependence on CrossFire profiles to favor it in a gaming build. Again, AMD’s Radeon R9 295X2 does deliver a 27%-better result at lower cost.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |